Hot Posts

6/recent/ticker-posts

Ex-KDF Major Accused Of Killing Wife And 2 Own Kids Faces A legal Hurdle



In November 2019, a devastating tragedy struck when the ex-KDF Major’s wife and two children were found dead. The former Major was quickly identified as the prime suspect in their deaths.

The case drew significant public attention due to the nature of the crime and the suspect's military background.

The crux of the Major's defense revolves around jurisdiction. Jurisdiction determines which court has the authority to hear a case. 

In this instance, the ex-Major argues that because he was serving in the KDF at the time, the military court should handle his case.

Kenya has distinct systems for military and civilian legal matters. Military courts deal with offenses committed by military personnel under the Kenya Defence Forces Act. 

Civilian courts handle regular criminal and civil cases. The ex-Major’s argument suggests that, as a soldier, any crimes he may have committed should be adjudicated by military authorities, who understand military life and its unique pressures.

The argument is not merely technical but raises important questions about fairness and justice. Military courts operate differently from civilian ones, with different procedures and penalties. 

The ex-Major believes that a military court would be better equipped to understand his actions and offer a fair trial given his military background and the possible psychological impacts of his service.

On the other hand, the prosecution insists that the murders should be tried in a civilian court. They argue that regardless of his military status, the crimes were committed against civilians—his family. 


If the court decides in favor of the ex-Major's argument, it may pave the way for more military personnel to seek trials in military courts for crimes that would typically fall under civilian jurisdiction.








Post a Comment

0 Comments